Politico: “However outlandish that prospect may sound, constitutional law experts say she's right. The court's decision in Trump v. United States would appear to grant immunity to a hypothetical president who actually ordered his troops to kill, but the president might have a hard time finding anyone to carry out such an order.”
“The crux of the problem, legal scholars say, is that the decision grants the president blanket immunity for any action he takes using the “core powers” vested in his office by the Constitution. One of those powers is the power to command the military.”
Save to favorites