Today's Oral Debate Trump v. Anderson I strongly suggest a Trump victory on the grounds that Josh Blackman and Seth Barrett Tillman heroically pushed forward. We give them a lot of praise for their long and successful campaign. The court will likely overturn the Colorado Supreme Court's ruling. griffin incidentIn the absence of a bill of Congress implementing Section 3, the sound and pragmatic arguments presented in Section 3 of the brief signed by Attorneys General Edwin Meese III, Michael B. Mukasey, William P. Barr, myself, and Gary Lawson .
Justices Ketanji Brown Jackson and Neil Gorsuch tried valiantly and failed to get Trump's lawyers to address the case, another plausible entry into the Supreme Court. The argument is that Section 3 does not apply to the President of the United States. They provided definitions for the terms “officer of the United States” and the words “office” and “officer,” but they did not tell Trump's terrible lawyers what the phrase “” means. There was no pressure to say anything.office *** Under USA“, exactly the language that appears in both Section 3 of the Fourteenth Amendment and the Incompatibilities Clause.
If the president “Office *** USA“When dealing with Donald Trump under Section 3 of the 14th Amendment”U.S. affiliated offices“Member of Congress”Office of the United States.” This means that the Presidential Succession Act of 1947 is unconstitutional because it allows either the Speaker of the House of Representatives or the President Pro Tempore of the Senate to simultaneously serve as a member of both houses of Congress and assume the office of President in the President's absence. There is both a President and a Vice President, and the President's office is ““United States Office”.
The Founding Fathers included legislative officials in the line of succession to the President at the Second Congress in 1792, attended by many of the Constitution's framers. President George Washington signed the Presidential Succession Act of 1792, ignoring complaints from Representative James Madison that legislative officials could not be included in the line of presidential succession. Because doing so would violate the incompatibilism clause. President Washington and the Framers of the Second Congress did not consider the office of the President to be “the office of the President.”U.S. affiliated offices“For purposes of the incompatibility clause. This also applies to the presidency”Office *** USA“For purposes of Section 3 of the Fourteenth Amendment to the Constitution.