Guest post by Jerome Corsi – Originally published American thinker – Reposted with permission
Dr. Andrew Paquette, director of research for the volunteer civic group New York Citizens Audit (NYCA), has now proven that New York State's voter registration rolls contain algorithms designed to promote election fraud.
To understand how serious this is, you need to understand how voter registration data works. All registration data is based on an algorithm, which is essentially an equation that is added to registrations in chronological order to convert voter identification numbers (“Voter ID numbers”) into a code. In an honest system, the voter who registered first would receive voter ID number 1, the voter who registered second would receive voter ID number 2, and so on. In other words, there is a direct correlation between registration date sequence and ID number. , the ID number increases by 1.
But Dr. Paquette discovered a different algorithm. This changes the allocation of voter ID numbers so that ID numbers no longer increase based on voter registration order. Instead, the ID numbers are displayed jumbled, with no linear sequential order.
Why would someone do something like this?
First, understand that using an algorithm to change voter registration data is clear evidence that someone has committed a crime. In an honest world, voter registration lists should be honest. Any algorithm added to the voter registration database to change the orderly flow of information available when a criminal intent on committing election fraud controls the Election Commission is presumed to be fraudulent.
![](https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/06/data-voter-fraud-algorithm.jpg)
Dr. Paquette claims, “The algorithm still being added to the New York State voter registration database is a complex math-based encryption scheme with National Security Agency levels of complexity.”
Paquette describes the algorithm as a “spiral cipher” record of New York State's registered voter rolls. Table 1 below shows the problem (red column numbers added for clarity). Column 1 contains the registration date. Column 2 contains the county voter identification number (“CID”) that is assigned to people when they register by county. Column 3 contains the State Board of Elections number (“SBOEID”), which reflects the conversion of the state’s CID into its own database.
The first problem is that the CID and SBOEID numbers are related, but not related to each other. The second, more serious problem is that the numbers bear no reasonable relationship to the order in which the registrations should have occurred. For example, the numbers in column 2 go up sequentially. The numbers in column 3 (SBOEID numbers) do not and are explained in columns 5 and 6.
Registration dates in the 1800s also changed, making it appear that the CID and SBOEID assigned to that voter were randomly assigned. After all, in 1850, 22 million voters were not registered in New York State. More importantly, the CID or SBOEID of two voters registered on the same date, January 1, 1850, should not be numerically too far apart (see columns 5 and 6). A voter registered from 1902 to 1907 would have a lower CID and SBOEID than a voter registered in 1850.
![](https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/06/jefferson-county-new-york.jpg)
Paquette concluded that Spiral Cipher's purpose is to separate registration dates from logically aligned ID numbers so that fake voter registrations can be hidden and tracked if necessary. Because while a normal reviewer might not know how to track down a voter ID, a spiral cipher would know where the forged records are in the database. If you need more votes for a particular candidate than legally exist, you can covertly send mail-in ballots to a fraudulent SBOEID.
These absentee ballots are reserved so you can call them when needed. You then have a seemingly legitimate SBOEID that can be certified for elections.
Putting an algorithm that scrambles information into state voter registration rolls appears to be a clear violation of state election law. That's because U.S. election law has always stated that state boards of elections are responsible for maintaining voter integrity by ensuring voter rolls are fully transparent and publicly auditable. Using encryption ciphers to obfuscate data in a way that makes it audit-proof seems like a clear violation of these requirements.
to sum up:
- This particular spiral encryption scheme appears to explain why bad actors want to stop vote counting on election nights when their preferred candidate loses.
- While counting is paused, enough mail-in ballots with fraudulent SBOEIDs could be received to cancel the election.
- When counting resumes, the preferred candidate suddenly overtakes the opponent, a pattern that may repeat itself until the election, when the preferred candidate becomes locked in. Election fraud will be difficult to properly challenge legally because mail-in ballots can be certified.
In 2023, an article titled “Caesar Ciphers and Stacking the Deck on New York State Voter Rolls” was published. Information Warfare JournalPaquette explained his hypothesis that the algorithm systematically builds possibilities for election fraud into the New York State Board of Elections voter registration rolls.
Paquette noted in a 2023 paper:
The official NYSBOE contains hundreds of thousands of illegally created registrations. [New York State Board of Election] Voter list. Although exact numbers are unknown, there are approximately 338,000 active registrations for the 2020 General Election (NYCA 2022). Including other elections, the number of registrations that appear to be illegal amounts to 1.2 to 1.4 million.
Since then, Pacquette has upgraded its original estimated enrollment jump from between 1.2 and 1.4 million to at least closer to 2 million.
None of the arguments presented here “prove” that Joe Biden “stole” the 2020 general election in New York or anywhere else. The point of this article is to raise questions about voter integrity. That's because similar algorithms have been found on voter registration lists from several other state boards of elections, particularly Ohio's.
In conclusion, let me emphasize that my purpose in writing this article is to keep voters honest. These findings do not claim that any particular election in New York State or elsewhere was fraudulent. This article is a request for further investigation.
People who want a more detailed explanation of helical ciphers should contact him at his Substack. ZarkFiles.substack.com.
If you would like a more detailed explanation of spiral ciphers, please contact Dr. Paquette in the substack. ZarkFiles.substack.com. For technical discussion on the New York SBOEID algorithm, Watch the author's podcast with Dr. Paquette..
Dr. Corsi's most recent book is his second on the JFK assassination: David Mantik, MD, Ph.D. and Jerome R. Corsi, Ph.D. Assassination of President John F. Kennedy: The Final Analysis: Forensic analysis of JFK's autopsy x-rays revealed two facial photographs from the front and one from the rear. Since 2004, Jerome R. Corsi has published more than 30 books on economics, history, and politics, including two New York Times bestsellers. He received his doctorate in 1972. He graduated from Harvard University's Department of Government. The first volume of his book, the Great Awakening Trilogy, The Truth About Energy, Global Warming, and Climate Change: Exposing Climate Lies in an Age of Disinformation, has received very positive reviews from prominent climate scientists and professional meteorologists. Volume 2, The Truth About Neo-Marxism, Cultural Maoism, and Anarchy: Exposing the Madness Awakened in the Age of Disinformation, was published in August 2023. Dr. Corsi has resumed podcasting on his new website, TheTruthCentral.com.